Instructional learning is determining effective tools and procedures for assessing student learning needed to make decisions for planning and implementing instruction. Assessments have crucial implications for instruction and are aimed to foster worthwhile academic material for all students. Assessments are utilized to determine how well students are meeting their instructional goals and how to alter school curriculum and instruction so goals are met. But, if what the school assesses and how the school assesses do not match what is taught, then the assessment results can impede learning. Student’s futures may also be affected if the results of assessments are made via low quality tools not appropriate for the purpose. In other words, it is important that educators assess students prior to learning and then after learning has been instructed to ensure students are receiving adequate material and accommodations needed for effective learning to occur.
Assessment is a way test or see how someone is doing at something. Instructional assessment provides ways for teachers or people who are assessing students to provide a way to see where the student stands and what level the student is at achademically. Instructional assessment should be taken place before,durning, and after instruction has been implemented. Instructional assessment helps to see where the student should begin how well the student is doing and where the student ended.
When we weigh a cow, we see how much more it needs to weigh before we butcher it. So we see where it is and where it needs to go. This is what we do when we do instructional assessment. We assess the child's reading ability to see where he is and where he needs to go. It should not stop at just the testing and assessment. That would be like weighing the cow, then never weighing it again or butchering it. The assessment part is just the beginning. After that is when we try to figure out where we need to go from here and how to get there.
Instructional assessment includes skills that develop and uses tools and procedures for assessing a student’s learning. These tools and procedures should include grading practices, grading procedures, questionnaire, testing, and survey construction. The common measure of these instructional assessment tools help to determine particular areas of student performance; then a teacher gathers valuable information for future planning.
Instructional assessment is done before, during, and after instruction. When done before assessment, it gives a starting point for instruction. In the case of the cow, it gives it the beginning wieght. From this information we know what the students are capable of and what they need improvement on. When done during instruction, we are checking the progress of the students. Again with the cow, this is how much weight he has gained so far, and tells us how much more weight he needs to gain. The same with assessment during instruction. We can see what they have learned thus far, and the things they still need to learn. As for assessment after instruction, this is how we can see if we met the goal. For the cow, it is when he weighs enough to be sold. For students, it is when assessment shows they have met the instructional goal set at the beginning of the lesson. All three stages are important because they are crucial to having effective instruction
There are several aspects to instructional assessment. The cycle begins with a diagnosis of students' abilities and achievement in order to plan and implement instructional content and strategies appropriate for individual students' needs. Instruction is followed by diagnostic assessment in order to monitor students' progress and evaluate if the strategies implemented are working. If there is not sufficient progress then it is necessary to reteach and use different instructional approaches; however, if progress is adequate then proceed with a new cycle of instruction by assessing again.
Instructional assessment is a way to track a child's progress. The teacher should do an assessment at the beginning of the year to determine a baseline for instruction. The student then should be assessed during the school year. The student should make progress throughout the year as he/she gets more instruction in the classroom. An assessment can be so much more than just a test. It can be asking questions during the reading to check for understanding.
Instructional assessment is assessing what a student knows or doesn't know in a given content area before actual student instruction begins. This type of assessment gives the teacher important information to help develop a student's individual learning plan in order to better meet the academic needs of the learner.
Instructional assessment is taking a look at your instructional methods and assessing if those methods are working for your students. This is when teachers should assess or test their own methods to make sure that their students are learning the material that they are presenting to them. If the students are learning, great. If the students are not succeeding, teachers then need to change or modify their instructional format to accommodate their students. There will always be a few student who do not understand or comprehend the informaton given to them. This is when the teacher should take the extra time to change the instructional format or supplement the lesson for those particular students. It is our responsiblility to have our students succeed and we should change our instructional format accordingly. Students should not have to adjust to our teaching style.
Instructional assessment involves gathering information about the skills that students possess and their ability levels in different academic areas. The more teachers assess or measure students, the more the information gathered about the students grows or "gets fatter." The question is what do teachers do with the information they gather about students? Is the information used to plan instruction or strategies to help students or is the information just "excess fat." Teachers and schools should be sure the assessments they are doing are meaningful and that the information gathered is used to help teachers better their instruction which in turn helps the students.
It is a logical fallacy to believe that weighing a cow makes it fatter. Likewise, it is a logical fallacy to suppose students become better through assessment - I would go as far as calling it a "red herring," an argument not addressing the original issue, being a deliberate attempt to divert the argument by changing the subject. And there are people out there having an interest in diverting the public attention from the original topic, for assessment is a big issue in the U.S., bringing a lot of money (for certain software and textbook publishers), and costing a lot of money (for schools).
Alas, people are prone to logical fallacies. I dare to say that all the State testing did not and will not make American students more efficient learners. In Germany, we do not have any kind of state testing, and the students do not perform worse in international competition. What all the State testing is doing is taking valuable instructional time away from the teachers, that could be more productively invested in teaching strategies rather than "learning towards the test."
Instructional assessment as skills development to create and apply tools and procedures to assess student learning (such as test construction, grading procedures, and questionnaires) is an important measure to improve the quality of any educational system. We do not merely assess students; we continuously have to assess teaching, technologies, and programs, and conduct research to better the status quo of education. In order to lead our students to mastery, we have to track their progress by diagnosing skill gaps and intervening with targeted instruction.
It sounds nice in theory, but the practice conveys a completely different image; how many teachers actually do spend time and effort on doing pre- and post-tests, reading inventories, student profiles and diagnostic assessment, etc. in order to "target" their teaching methods to the needs of their diverse audiences? How many teachers are equipped with the necessary skills and capabilities to do that? It might be in human nature to be reluctant to changes, and many teachers do not update their teaching methods, going with the time.
This will become even more obvious when in 2012, "technological literacies" will become a graded subject in schools. We will not only teach reading and writing, we will teach the corresponding computer skills with it; and may the humble question be asked how many teachers are very confident in saying they are entirely familiar with it? In my education majors class, there are future teachers who do not know how to create an xls table, who have never held a ppt presentation, who have never seen a WebQuest, who do not know where to find buttons in Word 2007 - and those teachers will be in the schools soon to teach and assess technological literacy in their students. What our teacher education needs to do is to equip education majors better with the literacies they are supposed to apply and teach. Instead of submitting students to more testing, teachers should be tested with regard to their performance mirroring the time they are teaching in. Also, programs should be assessed first, and more research should be done before purchase, to save the schools' budget. I see instructional assessment falling short, and even in this course I did not see any checklists, scales, rubrics, guidelines, handouts, etc. dealing with assessment of teachers, while we encountered many assessment forms for student (reading) skills. How many tools are really available for teachers to assess their instruction? Do they all have to be "teacher-made" by the person teaching? Then, this process needs to be taught to education majors.
Instructional assessment helps teachers determine a students progress. Assessment should be completed before, during, and after.Assessment before instruction helps teachers determine the basis in which to begin. Assessment during instruction helps us determine how students are doing with the new material. Assessment after instruction helps us determine how students learned and retained the new information. All levels of assessment helps teachers adjust their lessons and teaching as needed. Assessment comes in many different forms such as questions, observations, and tests.
It is simple, really. It is asking yourself whether or not what you are teaching is working. The way you find out is to asses the learning of your students. Before your instruction you had a pre-test, or some technique for guaging prior knowledge and ability level for the content that is being taught. your instruction is guided by the results of that assessment. Then, after instruction, you assess yourself, both by reflecting on your own teaching practices (what seemed to work well and what did not) and by assessing the individual student progress. Then as Judy said, you either reteach using different strategies, or you move on to the next cycle of assess, teach, assess.
Instructional assessment is determining how well a student functions academically before, during, and after instruction but it is not the only determining factor in how well a student may perform. There are many things that can effect how a student performs such a nerves, an assessment being administered incorrectly, or that the student is not a strong test taker. Assessments are important but there are others factors that need to be taken into consideration.
Instructional assessment is any assessment aimed at preparing for instruction by finding out a student's strengths and weaknesses so that you can adjust instruction accordingly. Many teachers fear assessment and think, irrationally, that assessment will just cause problems. Assessment receives all sorts of opposition because teachers often do not understand the assessment, do not know what it is used to measure, and then do not know how to implement changes based on the outcomes of the assessment. Since they are unaware of how assessment can be used, they consider it meaningless and harmful, much like the cow example.
Instructional assessment, then, should be targeted around a specific set of skills. Teachers should use it so assess particular areas and put the pieces together to get the whole picture of a student's reading needs.
Teachers should also think before hand about how they will use the assessment and come up with options for how to address the various outcomes. If teachers were to anticipate how they would use assessment, they would be better prepared for instruction.
15 comments:
Instructional learning is determining effective tools and procedures for assessing student learning needed to make decisions for planning and implementing instruction. Assessments have crucial implications for instruction and are aimed to foster worthwhile academic material for all students. Assessments are utilized to determine how well students are meeting their instructional goals and how to alter school curriculum and instruction so goals are met. But, if what the school assesses and how the school assesses do not match what is taught, then the assessment results can impede learning. Student’s futures may also be affected if the results of assessments are made via low quality tools not appropriate for the purpose. In other words, it is important that educators assess students prior to learning and then after learning has been instructed to ensure students are receiving adequate material and accommodations needed for effective learning to occur.
Assessment is a way test or see how someone is doing at something. Instructional assessment provides ways for teachers or people who are assessing students to provide a way to see where the student stands and what level the student is at achademically. Instructional assessment should be taken place before,durning, and after instruction has been implemented. Instructional assessment helps to see where the student should begin how well the student is doing and where the student ended.
When we weigh a cow, we see how much more it needs to weigh before we butcher it. So we see where it is and where it needs to go. This is what we do when we do instructional assessment. We assess the child's reading ability to see where he is and where he needs to go. It should not stop at just the testing and assessment. That would be like weighing the cow, then never weighing it again or butchering it. The assessment part is just the beginning. After that is when we try to figure out where we need to go from here and how to get there.
Instructional assessment includes skills that develop and uses tools and procedures for assessing a student’s learning. These tools and procedures should include grading practices, grading procedures, questionnaire, testing, and survey construction. The common measure of these instructional assessment tools help to determine particular areas of student performance; then a teacher gathers valuable information for future planning.
Instructional assessment is done before, during, and after instruction. When done before assessment, it gives a starting point for instruction. In the case of the cow, it gives it the beginning wieght. From this information we know what the students are capable of and what they need improvement on. When done during instruction, we are checking the progress of the students. Again with the cow, this is how much weight he has gained so far, and tells us how much more weight he needs to gain. The same with assessment during instruction. We can see what they have learned thus far, and the things they still need to learn. As for assessment after instruction, this is how we can see if we met the goal. For the cow, it is when he weighs enough to be sold. For students, it is when assessment shows they have met the instructional goal set at the beginning of the lesson. All three stages are important because they are crucial to having effective instruction
There are several aspects to instructional assessment. The cycle begins with a diagnosis of students' abilities and achievement in order to plan and implement instructional content and strategies appropriate for individual students' needs. Instruction is followed by diagnostic assessment in order to monitor students' progress and evaluate if the strategies implemented are working. If there is not sufficient progress then it is necessary to reteach and use different instructional approaches; however, if progress is adequate then proceed with a new cycle of instruction by assessing again.
Instructional assessment is a way to track a child's progress. The teacher should do an assessment at the beginning of the year to determine a baseline for instruction. The student then should be assessed during the school year. The student should make progress throughout the year as he/she gets more instruction in the classroom. An assessment can be so much more than just a test. It can be asking questions during the reading to check for understanding.
Instructional assessment is assessing what a student knows or doesn't know in a given content area before actual student instruction begins. This type of assessment gives the teacher important information to help develop a student's individual learning plan in order to better meet the academic needs of the learner.
Instructional assessment is taking a look at your instructional methods and assessing if those methods are working for your students. This is when teachers should assess or test their own methods to make sure that their students are learning the material that they are presenting to them. If the students are learning, great. If the students are not succeeding, teachers then need to change or modify their instructional format to accommodate their students. There will always be a few student who do not understand or comprehend the informaton given to them. This is when the teacher should take the extra time to change the instructional format or supplement the lesson for those particular students. It is our responsiblility to have our students succeed and we should change our instructional format accordingly. Students should not have to adjust to our teaching style.
Instructional assessment involves gathering information about the skills that students possess and their ability levels in different academic areas. The more teachers assess or measure students, the more the information gathered about the students grows or "gets fatter." The question is what do teachers do with the information they gather about students? Is the information used to plan instruction or strategies to help students or is the information just "excess fat." Teachers and schools should be sure the assessments they are doing are meaningful and that the information gathered is used to help teachers better their instruction which in turn helps the students.
It is a logical fallacy to believe that weighing a cow makes it fatter. Likewise, it is a logical fallacy to suppose students become better through assessment - I would go as far as calling it a "red herring," an argument not addressing the original issue, being a deliberate attempt to divert the argument by changing the subject. And there are people out there having an interest in diverting the public attention from the original topic, for assessment is a big issue in the U.S., bringing a lot of money (for certain software and textbook publishers), and costing a lot of money (for schools).
Alas, people are prone to logical fallacies. I dare to say that all the State testing did not and will not make American students more efficient learners. In Germany, we do not have any kind of state testing, and the students do not perform worse in international competition. What all the State testing is doing is taking valuable instructional time away from the teachers, that could be more productively invested in teaching strategies rather than "learning towards the test."
Instructional assessment as skills development to create and apply tools and procedures to assess student learning (such as test construction, grading procedures, and questionnaires) is an important measure to improve the quality of any educational system. We do not merely assess students; we continuously have to assess teaching, technologies, and programs, and conduct research to better the status quo of education. In order to lead our students to mastery, we have to track their progress by diagnosing skill gaps and intervening with targeted instruction.
It sounds nice in theory, but the practice conveys a completely different image; how many teachers actually do spend time and effort on doing pre- and post-tests, reading inventories, student profiles and diagnostic assessment, etc. in order to "target" their teaching methods to the needs of their diverse audiences? How many teachers are equipped with the necessary skills and capabilities to do that? It might be in human nature to be reluctant to changes, and many teachers do not update their teaching methods, going with the time.
This will become even more obvious when in 2012, "technological literacies" will become a graded subject in schools. We will not only teach reading and writing, we will teach the corresponding computer skills with it; and may the humble question be asked how many teachers are very confident in saying they are entirely familiar with it? In my education majors class, there are future teachers who do not know how to create an xls table, who have never held a ppt presentation, who have never seen a WebQuest, who do not know where to find buttons in Word 2007 - and those teachers will be in the schools soon to teach and assess technological literacy in their students. What our teacher education needs to do is to equip education majors better with the literacies they are supposed to apply and teach. Instead of submitting students to more testing, teachers should be tested with regard to their performance mirroring the time they are teaching in. Also, programs should be assessed first, and more research should be done before purchase, to save the schools' budget. I see instructional assessment falling short, and even in this course I did not see any checklists, scales, rubrics, guidelines, handouts, etc. dealing with assessment of teachers, while we encountered many assessment forms for student (reading) skills. How many tools are really available for teachers to assess their instruction? Do they all have to be "teacher-made" by the person teaching? Then, this process needs to be taught to education majors.
Instructional assessment helps teachers determine a students progress. Assessment should be completed before, during, and after.Assessment before instruction helps teachers determine the basis in which to begin. Assessment during instruction helps us determine how students are doing with the new material. Assessment after instruction helps us determine how students learned and retained the new information. All levels of assessment helps teachers adjust their lessons and teaching as needed. Assessment comes in many different forms such as questions, observations, and tests.
It is simple, really. It is asking yourself whether or not what you are teaching is working. The way you find out is to asses the learning of your students. Before your instruction you had a pre-test, or some technique for guaging prior knowledge and ability level for the content that is being taught. your instruction is guided by the results of that assessment. Then, after instruction, you assess yourself, both by reflecting on your own teaching practices (what seemed to work well and what did not) and by assessing the individual student progress. Then as Judy said, you either reteach using different strategies, or you move on to the next cycle of assess, teach, assess.
Instructional assessment is determining how well a student functions academically before, during, and after instruction but it is not the only determining factor in how well a student may perform. There are many things that can effect how a student performs such a nerves, an assessment being administered incorrectly, or that the student is not a strong test taker. Assessments are important but there are others factors that need to be taken into consideration.
Instructional assessment is any assessment aimed at preparing for instruction by finding out a student's strengths and weaknesses so that you can adjust instruction accordingly. Many teachers fear assessment and think, irrationally, that assessment will just cause problems. Assessment receives all sorts of opposition because teachers often do not understand the assessment, do not know what it is used to measure, and then do not know how to implement changes based on the outcomes of the assessment. Since they are unaware of how assessment can be used, they consider it meaningless and harmful, much like the cow example.
Instructional assessment, then, should be targeted around a specific set of skills. Teachers should use it so assess particular areas and put the pieces together to get the whole picture of a student's reading needs.
Teachers should also think before hand about how they will use the assessment and come up with options for how to address the various outcomes. If teachers were to anticipate how they would use assessment, they would be better prepared for instruction.
Post a Comment